1.2 Tensile strength in principle
How much tension can a perfectly pure, perfectly homogeneous liquid withstand before the intermolecular potential of Lesson 1.1 loses cohesion entirely? Two arguments — one mechanical, one thermodynamic — give estimates in the range of atm for water at room temperature.
The mechanical (Born) estimate
The simplest argument inverts the bulk modulus. The liquid responds linearly to small pressure changes:
Extrapolate this linear response outside its regime of validity, to the strain at which in the Lennard-Jones potential reaches its maximum. For the LJ-12-6 potential, the maximum attractive force occurs at , which corresponds to a volumetric strain of . Apply this strain in the linear response and the implied tension is
This Born estimate overshoots the true theoretical strength because the linear relation badly fails at 23.5% strain. A more careful calculation that respects the actual shape of between and gives a tension closer to to atm. The order of magnitude is robust: the theoretical cohesive strength of water is somewhere between and atm, comparable to the bulk modulus itself.
▶ Cohesive limit from the Lennard-Jones potential
A more careful estimate proceeds as follows. The force per unit area required to hold each molecular pair at separation across a slice through the liquid is
where is the molecular number density (cube root of which is the inverse of the typical molecule-to-molecule distance, giving force per unit area when multiplied by the per-pair force).
Differentiating the Lennard-Jones potential:
Setting to find the strain at maximum tension gives , where the inflection-point force per molecule is
For water, take per hydrogen-bond pair, with about 4 hydrogen bonds per molecule (the tetrahedrally coordinated network). Per molecule this gives an effective bonding energy of about (each bond shared between two molecules, so divide by 2). Combined with and molecular density :
The order of magnitude — a few hundred atm to a thousand atm of tension — is robust across the variations in , , and molecular packing assumptions. The argument generalises to other simple liquids with similar predictions: ethanol atm, mercury atm (because mercury is held by much stronger metallic bonds).
The thermodynamic (spinodal) estimate
A second route to the cohesive limit comes from the equation of state. A real liquid at temperatures below its critical point has, in the space, a region of metastable states where the liquid persists below its vapour-pressure saturation curve. The boundary of metastability — the spinodal — is the locus where the isothermal compressibility diverges,
i.e., where the slope of the isotherm flattens to zero. Below this pressure the liquid cannot exist in principle: any infinitesimal perturbation lowers the local free energy by separating into a denser liquid and a vapour phase.
For water at 20 °C, the spinodal pressure computed from a realistic equation of state (the Speedy/Lemmon parametrisations) sits at about atm. This is the thermodynamic cohesive limit: tensions below this value are forbidden by the equation of state alone and not merely “weakly metastable.”
The two arguments — mechanical and thermodynamic — agree in order of magnitude. The cohesive limit of water at room temperature is approximately atm.
What ” atm” looks like physically
To pull on a column of water with a tension of 1000 atm is to apply about 100 MPa of negative pressure — equivalent to the pressure at 10 km below the sea surface but in the opposite direction. The required mechanical work to elastically extend a litre of water to this tension is roughly
A few joules — pulling on a chamber with a piston, slowly. Not, on paper, an extraordinary experiment.
In practice, no such experiment succeeds. Most laboratory water samples tear at tensions a thousand times smaller. The next lesson surveys what people have actually measured.